Ethical Bond Fund


Fund overview

The Fund aims to achieve a combination of income and capital growth. It invests mainly in investment grade UK credit bonds which meet predefined ethical criteria. The manager can hold other securities including government bonds, index linked securities and non-sterling credit when the manager believes they are appropriate. The Fund gives investors access to a broad universe of sterling denominated fixed interest investments and represents an effective way of accessing the full skills and experience of RLAM’s fixed interest team in a single investment vehicle. The Fund seeks to maximise investment return over the medium to long term.

Fund manager

Eric Holt has extensive knowledge of UK investment grade and high yield corporate bonds, gained over a career spanning more than 30 years. He has overall responsibility for RLAM’s credit research process, as well as managing the Sterling Extra Yield Bond Fund and the Ethical Bond Fund. He joined RLAM in 1999 following Royal London’s acquisition of Refuge Assurance’s investment team, where he had worked for the previous 20 years. Eric is a graduate of Nottingham University with a degree in mathematics and is an associate of the Institute of Actuaries.

Investment approach

Central to the investment process used across our Fixed Interest Team is the belief that fixed interest markets offer inefficiencies that can be exploited. The Fund aims to achieve outperformance from multiple sources (e.g. asset allocation, stock selection, duration and yield curve management as well as off-benchmark investing).

RLAM has an experienced credit team which firmly believes in its core philosophy of favouring 'covenants, structure and security'. This means that we do not rely just on credit ratings; a key question for us is: “are we getting sufficient reward for the risk we are taking?”. In practice this means that credit bonds that are excluded from the credit benchmark (e.g. unrated bonds, smaller issue size bonds, sub-investment grade bonds and non-Sterling bonds) are held where valuations are believed to be attractive. This approach allows the team to focus on investing for the longer term.

The Fund adopts a broad policy of not investing in companies and organisations with significant trading interests in the following sectors:

  • Alcohol – involvement in brewing, distillation or sale of alcoholic drinks
  • Armaments - manufacture of armaments or nuclear weapons or associated products
  • Gambling - investments in betting shops, casinos or amusement arcades
  • Tobacco - growing, processing or sale of tobacco products
  • Pornography - adult entertainment services
  • Environment - companies which have a high environmental impact and which have ‘no evidence’ of appropriate environmental management systems
  • Human rights - companies with a strategic presence operating in countries of concern and which have ‘no evidence’ of policies or systems to manage human rights risks
  • Animal testing - companies that test cosmetics, household products and other products (excluding medicines), on animals. Companies that provide animal testing services or test ingredients of these products will also be excluded.

As a consequence of the investment philosophy and the ethical constraints of the Fund, sector and stock positions will differ from its benchmark. Asset allocation, interest rate views and stock / sector selection will be the key risks within the Fund. Credit diversification is deemed an important means of reducing single name credit risk.

Product Risk Warning

Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and the income from them is not guaranteed and may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested. For funds that use derivatives, their use may be beneficial, however, they also involve specific risks. Derivatives may alter the economic exposure of a fund over time, causing it to deviate from the performance of the broader market. Sub-investment grade bonds have characteristics which may result in a higher probability of default than investment grade bonds and therefore a higher risk.

Webinar